![]() “But its biggest fans want more Modern Warfare or Black Ops multiplayer mayhem. ![]() “As with last year’s blockbuster Battlefield comeback, Battlefield 1-which features a World War I setting and very strong single-player campaign-Activision is not surprisingly plumbing its past, and nostalgia, in an effort to regain the support of its biggest fans,” I wrote. Want up- to-the-minute entertainment news and features? Just hit 'Like' on our Digital Spy Facebook page and 'Follow' on our Twitter account and you're all set.When Activision announced that it was returning to the World War II setting for the next Call of Duty, I noted that World War II was not the answer for a blockbuster game franchise that has lost its way. We've reached out to Activision for comment. It's clear that the appetite for real-world conflicts in shooters is still strong, as shown by the titanic sales of EA's World War I-themed Battlefield 1 last year. The pitch shift could be a wise move for Activision. ![]() Moving backwards in time would probably result in the removal of features like jetpacks and wall-running, as well as some of Infinite Warfare's more outlandish special abilities. Hauling the game back into the 20th Century would be a return to the series' roots, which began back in 2003 with the WW2-themed Call of Duty. Since then the series increasingly drifted into the realm of science fiction – a decision which has received a mixed response from fans, especially in the case of last year's Infinite Warfare. Sledgehammer Games' last entry in the series was CoD: Advanced Warfare back in 2014.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |